Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Thank-you and much success!!
By Anita L. Coles
I have really enjoyed this class and my colleagues. I would like to thank-you all because of you have grown more; understood more; felt confident more; and felt a part of a team more. I did not realize how time has flown… I am sure it was because I have had a great deal of fun in this class, partly because I found this class extremely interesting and the other part was because of how each of my colleagues have made me go beyond my own thinking to discover that there is a whole new way of thinking and learning…once again THANK-YOU ALL and I wish each and every one a successful journey!! : )… If you are ever in the Las Cruces area please look my establishment up “Little Steps/New Beginning Childcare and Learning Facility “  You all have truly have helped  me grow with also has help me& my staff become an even better childcare provider…

Sunday, June 16, 2013

The five stages team development

The five stages team development
By Anita L. Coles
I think the hardest group I have encounter was my social work colleagues group. We had to do a funding proposal. There were four in the group three women and one male.  Although we were familiar with one another’s faces and names, we had not gotten around to any formal introductions.
            Our first meeting classified as the “formatting” (Abudi, 2009-2010, p. 2) took place in our college classroom at that time; we made our introductions, as well as establishing who was going to do what. The assigning parts were not hard because only one member was aware, at the time, of the mechanics of putting together and presenting a proposal of any category and because of deadline date was very short we voted hands down that Earl would be the team leader, however, as other parts were being assigned the conflicts begun.
            Some felt that their assigned parts were either asking of them too much or too little. Earl being the lead person had those individuals who were unhappy with their assignments switch and all was well. There were very little disagreements because the team leader was very knowledgeable concerning the layout of our perspective funding proposal. Although Earl left each member to work on their assigned part of the proposal, he did leave himself available as needed.  In fact, the team met and worked on the proposal at Earl and his wife’s home.  
            The last part of the assignment was conducted in the classroom. The last part of the proposal was tenuous because all the facts and figures had to match so that when the team stood before the classroom and the instructor every part of the proposal should be easy enough for a layman, and professional enough to captivate the funding to team. The proposal was a success. Once the project was over, the team did split up; however, the team became very close. After graduating the College of Social Work, Earl and I were hired and worked at the same job. Other team members worked at different agencies but still kept in touch.
I think even thought my colleagues and I may not know each other than pictures and blog reviews I still feel a certain amount of closeness.

Reference

Abudi, G. (2009-2010). The five stages of team development: A case study  

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Disagreements and conflicts

Disagreements and conflicts
As I stated in my discussion, it seems a bit strange that the most of our assignments have been about a situation that I am or just finished going through. Than it, once again, hit me, it just seems that way because or courses are about everyday life situations. In any case, I am going through a conflict with a very close family member and have been for months.
                The problem is that this individual has been going through some very serious financial problems. This individual is constantly borrowing money from anybody who will loan money, but when it is time for this person to pay the money back the loaner has to run this individual down for the repayment. However, this is not the worse part most of the time this individual does not pay the entire loan back.
The problem is that because of my business and my line of work in the past I am well known, so what happens it that people will either come to me to complain and or expect me to encourage repayment. In the past I would try talk with the relative and this is what started our conflicts. To be honest up until I reviewed our week five materials I felt in the middle, resentful, and anger that my relative was still borrowing and that individuals were still loaning this person monies. I have learned so much by reading our week five reading material.
The information in which I read is not as if it were my first time being aware of certain parts of the information, but I think that in some cases it was my first time really listening. I realized what part that I was playing in this merry-go-round. I like helping people, and my line of work has been mostly helping individuals experiencing hardships. I became embarrassed to know that my relative was asking for help in the name of hardship and even more so embarrassed when those individuals who loan money ask me for help in trying to recover their loses. What I did to try to help resolve this situation is I offer to help my relative do a budget which they declined the help. I provided my relative with information about “free” financial counseling seminars.
The relative made excuses as to why they could not attend any of the seminars. The last thing that I offered was a set of CD’s that my son had made for me (my son and his wife when living in Germany did free financial seminars in their church; these seminar were supervised by a successful, well-known TV and Radio financial advisor).
The relative agreed to take the CD’s home but conveniently leaves behind every time. What I think that I learned was that I allow myself to me be in middle, and  realizing that to be a fact, I allowed myself to be dismissed from the whole situation all together.
I explained to my relative’s loaners that knowing the possibility of loan repayment and still willing to make the loans, in my opinion, meant that the loaners are getting something out of making the loans possible.  My relative is fully aware of the situation and the problem is between the loaners and my relative not me. I informed the loaners as well the borrower that I would no longer take or be a part of the disagreements and or their conflicts.
 I really believe that in order to resolve conflicts at least one half of the participates needs to be willing to look within themselves to see what part they are playing and need to be willing to want to changed. What I saw in this situation is a “lack of fairness,” ‘When someone uses more than a fair share of resources, it commonly leads to conflict” (O’Hair, Wiemann, p. 225).
                                           
                                               Reference
O’ Hair, D., & Wiemann, M. (2012). Real communication an interdiction.  
               Bedford/St. Martin’s Boston. New York



Saturday, June 1, 2013

Who Am I as a Communicator?

Who Am I as a Communicator?
By
Anita L. Coles
          
       In taking the test I assigned numbers to make sure that I would not confused whose scores were whose. I assigned the numbers 1, 2, & 3, me being number and so on. Our scores were almost identical except for the Verbal Aggressiveness Scale score (Taylor & Francis Group, 2009). I scored myself a 70. Number two scored me a 57, and number three a 63. 
         
        After reading both score results I knew without a doubt that I fell under the moderate level. After reading the significant level I knew right away that this level did not describe me at all. I was very surprise that our scores were so far apart. I am not too sure why I scored myself in the 70 area. The only thing that comes to my mind is that I did not want to sound like I was trying to toot my own horn, and would therefore rather underscore myself than sound conceited.
         
            In the Listening Styles Profile (Taylor & Francis Group, 2009), I fell under the Group 1 level. In the Communication Anxiety Inventory (Rubin, Rubin, Graham, Perse, & Seibold, 2009) number two scored me at 35, number three at 31, and I scored myself at 35, working with families and with the public for so many years have helped me to feel comfortable with public speaking, as well as feeling comfortable with talking for the first time with new people. However, if someone would have tested me on these questions fifteen years ago it would be a totally different story. All I can say is I am happy that Public Speaking was part of my college degree plan.
          
            Another thing that surprise me was although I try to be very conscious of how I listen to others, especially when I was working with families who had children with delays, I wanted to make sure that the families always felt and believed that I cared about them and their children (I can be somewhat of a dreamer if I am not careful), however, I was not sure if anyone else notice if I was attentive listener when others were talking to me. I feel super good knowing that it (according to those who scored me) is evident that I am a good listener. I think that this will also encourage me in continuing to want to work even harder on improving my listening skills.





References
Communication Measures: Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E.
           (Eds.) (2009). Communication research measures: A sourcebook. New
           York: Routledge
Communication Measure: Rubin, R. B., Rubin, A. M., Graham, E. E., Perse,
          E. M., & Seibold, D. R. (Eds.) (2009). Communication research

          measures II: A sourcebook. New York: Routledge.